I have been fascinated by the idea of building computer systems which are inconsistency tolerant for many years. I usually address this problem from practical perspective: I just try to write code that demonstrates behavior that I would like to model. But I always thought that it should be beneficial to have some kind of a formal logic that can provide foundations for my heuristic approach. I follow Carl Hewitt’s work for many years and it seems that his inconsistency tolerant Direct Logic can play this foundational role. Firstly, let’s take a look at how traditional logic handles contradictions …
Subject: Paraconsistent logic
Inconsistency-tolerant logic
Related posts:
Saturday, March 27, 2010, 02:23 PM
Saturday, January 23, 2010, 02:10 PM
I just finished reading “Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist: Modeling in RDF, RDFS and OWL”. Great book! Lots of examples and deep exploration of Semantic Web fundamentals. It inspired me… not to use OWL, no… but to describe how we approach inference/reasoning in Ontopedia. ...
Archive:
-
Paraconsistent Reasoning in Ontopedia
I did a short presentation about paraconsistent reasoning in Ontopedia on TMRA 2009.
-
Carl Hewitt - Actor model, OWL, knowledge inconsistency and paraconsistent logic
ITConversations published recently Jon Udell’s interview with Carl Hewitt. In this interview – “Interdependent Message-Passing ORGs”, Carl Hewitt shares his ideas about distributed computations, Actor model, inconsistent knowledge, paraconsistent logic and semantic web.