What if every subject that we think about can have explicit representation in our computers?

Subject: Paraconsistent logic

Inconsistency-tolerant logic

Related posts:

Carl Hewitt's Direct Logic, inconsistency tolerant reasoning and Subject-centric computing

 

I have been fascinated by the idea of building computer systems which are inconsistency tolerant for many years. I usually address this problem from practical perspective: I just try to write code that demonstrates behavior that I would like to model. But I always thought that it should be beneficial to have some kind of a formal logic that can provide foundations for my heuristic approach. I follow Carl Hewitt’s work for many years and it seems that his inconsistency tolerant Direct Logic can play this foundational role. Firstly, let’s take a look at how traditional logic handles contradictions …

 
· Carl Hewitt · Paraconsistent logic · Subject-centric computing ·

Inference in Ontopedia

 

I just finished reading “Semantic Web for the Working Ontologist: Modeling in RDF, RDFS and OWL”. Great book! Lots of examples and deep exploration of Semantic Web fundamentals. It inspired me… not to use OWL, no… but to describe how we approach inference/reasoning in Ontopedia. ...

 
· Common Logic · Cyc · OWL · Paraconsistent logic · Subject-centric computing ·

Archive: Index